Upcoming Events

July 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
August 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031EC
September 2010
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930EC

EPA Noise restrictions

Have you taken the time to read the lat­est MRF report con­cern­ing EPA noise restrictions?

Let’s think about how loud the cur­rent limit is. Take the 83 deci­bel max deci­bel rat­ing and com­pare it to this chart for ref­er­ence. Not very loud is it? I know the most com­mon com­plaint about motor­cy­cles is about noise, but I highly doubt it is related to stock exhaust lev­els. If the EPA wants to reduce the noise lev­els and com­plaints, the focus should be on where the noise is com­ing from (after­mar­ket sys­tems and muf­flers) rather than the cur­rent stock levels.

Loud pipes save lives” is a phrase I have heard many times before over the years. What I’m still wait­ing on is some amount of evi­dence that this is true. There have been plenty of traf­fic safety stud­ies (for auto and motor­cy­cle) and I haven’t found any evi­dence about how a louder vehi­cle is a safer vehi­cle. If there is, please point me to it as I’m will­ing to read up and have my mind changed. Anec­do­tal sto­ries really do not count.

That the EPA is inten­tion­ally bend­ing the nor­mal fed­eral pro­ce­dures for spend­ing money on sur­vey­ing com­pa­nies is fod­der for another post­ing, so we’ll leave it at that for now. Keep it rub­ber side down folks.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>